Maternal and neonatal complications of shoulder dystocia with a focus on obstetric maneuvers: A case-control study of 1103 deliveries.

INTRODUCTION: Shoulder dystocia is a severe obstetric emergency that can cause substantial neonatal and maternal complications. This study aims to assess the performed obstetric maneuvers and their frequency, success, and association with maternal and neonatal complication rates. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study population was collected among all deliveries in the Hospital District of Helsinki and Uusimaa between 2006 and 2015 (n = 181 352) by searching for ICD-10 codes for shoulder dystocia, brachial plexus injury and clavicle fracture. Shoulder dystocia cases (n = 537) were identified by reviewing the medical records. Shoulder dystocia cases treated with one or two maneuvers were compared with those treated with at least three. Medical records of a matched control group constituting of 566 parturients without any of the forementioned ICD-10 codes were also scrutinized. RESULTS: Using the four most common obstetric maneuvers (McRoberts maneuver, suprapubic pressure, rotational maneuvers, the delivery of the posterior arm) significantly increased during the study period with individual success rates of 61.0%, 71.9%, 68.1% and 84.8%, respectively. Concurrently, the rate of brachial plexus injury and combined neonatal morbidity significantly declined from 50% to 24.2% (p = 0.02) and from 91.4% to 48.5% (p < 0.001). Approximately 75% of shoulder dystocia cases treated with maneuvers were resolved by the McRoberts maneuver and/or suprapubic pressure, but each of the four most performed maneuvers significantly increased the cumulative success rate individually and statistically (p < 0.001). The rates of brachial plexus injury and combined neonatal morbidity were at their highest (52.9% and 97.8%) when none of the maneuvers were performed and at their lowest when two maneuvers were performed (43.0% and 65.4%). The increasing number (≥3) of maneuvers did not affect the combined maternal or neonatal morbidity or brachial plexus injury but increased the risk for third- or fourth-degree lacerations (odds ratio 2.91, 95% confidence interval 1.17 to 7.24). CONCLUSIONS: The increased use of obstetric maneuvers during the study period was associated with decreasing rates of neonatal complications; conversely, the lack of obstetric maneuvers was associated with the highest rate of neonatal complications. These emphasize the importance of education, maneuver training and urgently performing shoulder dystocia maneuvers according to the international protocol guidelines.

Pitfalls in the diagnostics of shoulder dystocia: an analysis based on the scrutiny of 2274 deliveries.

PURPOSE: Shoulder dystocia is an obstetric emergency with severe complications. Our objective was to evaluate the major pitfalls in the diagnostics of shoulder dystocia, diagnostic descriptions documented in medical records, use of obstetric maneuvers, and their correlations to Erb's and Klumpke's palsy and the use of ICD-10 code 066.0. METHODS: A retrospective, register-based case-control study included all deliveries (n = 181 352) in Hospital District of Helsinki and Uusimaa (HUS) area in 2006-2015. Potential shoulder dystocia cases (n = 1708) were identified from the Finnish Medical Birth Register and the Hospital Discharge Register using ICD-10 codes O66.0, P13.4, P14.0, and P14.1. After thorough assessment of all medical records, 537 shoulder dystocia cases were confirmed. Control group consisted of 566 women without any of these ICD-10 codes. RESULTS: The pitfalls in the diagnostic included suboptimal following of guidelines for making the diagnosis of shoulder dystocia, subjective interpretation of diagnostic criteria, and inexact or inadequate documentation in medical records. The diagnostic descriptions in medical record were highly inconsistent. The use of obstetric maneuvers was suboptimal among shoulder dystocia cases (57.5%). Overall, the use of obstetric maneuvers increased during the study period (from 25.7 to 97.0%, p < 0.001), which was associated with decreasing rate of Erb's palsy and increasing use of ICD-10 code O66.0. CONCLUSION: There are diagnostic pitfalls, which could be addressed by education regarding shoulder dystocia guidelines, by improved use obstetric maneuvers, and more precise documentation. The increased use of obstetric maneuvers was associated with lower rates of Erb's palsy and improved coding of shoulder dystocia.

Rising trends in the incidence of shoulder dystocia and development of a novel shoulder dystocia risk score tool: a nationwide population-based study of 800 484 Finnish deliveries.

INTRODUCTION: Shoulder dystocia has remained an unpredictable and feared emergency in obstetrics. Some risk factors have been identified but nevertheless there is a lack of risk evaluation tools in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence and risk factors of shoulder dystocia in the Finnish population and to develop a shoulder dystocia risk score tool. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective, population-based study included all deliveries in Finland between 2004 and 2017 (n = 800 484). The annual numbers of shoulder dystocia diagnoses were gathered from nationwide Finnish Medical Birth Register and Hospital Discharge Register. The incidence of shoulder dystocia was calculated in subgroups according to the mode of delivery, maternal diabetes status, body mass index (BMI), age, parity and gestational age. Based on these numbers, a shoulder dystocia risk score tool was created. RESULTS: The overall incidence of shoulder dystocia was 0.18%. It increased significantly during the study period from 0.10% to 0.32% (P < .001). More specifically, the incidence increased significantly in all analyzed subgroups except for women with BMI <18.5 or age <20 years. To evaluate the importance of risk factors, practical and simple shoulder dystocia risk score tool was created. Instrumental vaginal delivery, maternal diabetes of any kind, BMI ≥25, age ≥40 years and gestational age ≥41 weeks were associated with higher shoulder dystocia risk compared with non-diabetic, non-obese and younger women with spontaneous deliveries before 41 weeks of gestation. In our risk score tool, cases with shoulder dystocia had a significantly higher number of risk points than those without it (15.2 vs 10.4, P < .001). The risk was significantly high when the scores were ≥18 points (relative risk 9.54, 95% confidence interval 8.61-10.57). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of shoulder dystocia in Finland increased during the study period but it is still low compared with previous studies from other countries. In clinical daily practice, the new shoulder dystocia risk score tool helps to evaluate the individual risk profile of the parturient. According to this risk score tool, the highest risk was found with the combination of instrumental vaginal delivery, maternal diabetes, BMI ≥25, age ≥40 years and gestational age ≥41 weeks.